Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-19 01:44:56 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

OP says she’s worried, a personal opinion. It’s a matter of legitimate dispute whether the charges are unfairly targeting some attorneys for political reasons. NNN. Defenses of the controversial indictment should be a reply, rather than a community note. https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2022/09/12/responding-to-ethics-complaint-jeffrey-clark-says-he-was-allowed-to-dissent-from-doj-leadership/

Written by 89C8AE69FDE5D707D24846081584734FADEC752F79D961D2C7FBDE69BD692AE0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1691933180176056491

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1692714230485512350
  • noteId - 1692714230485512350
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 89C8AE69FDE5D707D24846081584734FADEC752F79D961D2C7FBDE69BD692AE0 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692409496317
  • tweetId - 1691933180176056491
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • OP says she’s worried, a personal opinion. It’s a matter of legitimate dispute whether the charges are unfairly targeting some attorneys for political reasons. NNN. Defenses of the controversial indictment should be a reply, rather than a community note. https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2022/09/12/responding-to-ethics-complaint-jeffrey-clark-says-he-was-allowed-to-dissent-from-doj-leadership/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-19 01:44:56 UTC
(1692409496317)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-20 02:11:21 UTC
(1692497481502)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-19 18:59:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 18:29:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 16:35:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 11:30:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 07:53:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 06:24:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 01:27:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 00:24:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 22:55:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 22:16:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 17:57:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 20:32:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 13:14:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 12:58:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 01:40:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-21 23:12:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-21 23:09:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-21 19:41:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-21 19:38:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 21:49:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 21:08:43 -0500 Rating Details