Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-17 20:09:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Grand juries are used to allow indictments to proceed based on majority (not unanimous) vote. It's fair to characterize the prosecutor bringing the indictment to the grand jury as the one doing the indicting. https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-procedure/how-does-a-grand-jury-work.html

Written by 2E5686F7FE6F2E5F04BDB8FBFD012AD5AC5208B0B50BCF485E9F0525F2DE5013
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1692253654433100123

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1692267510169755755
  • noteId - 1692267510169755755
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2E5686F7FE6F2E5F04BDB8FBFD012AD5AC5208B0B50BCF485E9F0525F2DE5013 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692302989892
  • tweetId - 1692253654433100123
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Grand juries are used to allow indictments to proceed based on majority (not unanimous) vote. It's fair to characterize the prosecutor bringing the indictment to the grand jury as the one doing the indicting. https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-procedure/how-does-a-grand-jury-work.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-17 20:09:49 UTC
(1692302989892)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-18 02:12:18 UTC
(1692324738224)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-17 18:00:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 17:17:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 16:24:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 16:23:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 16:05:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 16:01:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 15:39:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 15:24:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 15:15:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 15:15:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 15:13:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 00:47:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 23:23:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 11:57:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 11:17:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 10:12:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 09:19:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 09:06:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 08:19:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 06:34:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 06:26:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 03:52:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 23:02:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 19:33:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 14:12:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 07:01:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 17:22:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 16:37:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 15:18:01 -0500 Rating Details