Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-17 05:39:00 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

La FDA n’a en réalité jamais interdit l’usage de l’ivermectine pour le COVID-19 et n’a donc pas changé d’avis. La FDA n’a cependant jamais reconnu l’efficacité du traitement. Aux USA, les médecins sont libres de prescrire des médicaments autorisés, y compris inefficaces. https://t.co/ts3hgRVr76

Written by 6220A18A3E1DF65D0DFE493C0B4E85BEB434B0F4D2CF782CFDD02DA20EFD093E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1691741456145252464

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1692048361237491730
  • noteId - 1692048361237491730
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6220A18A3E1DF65D0DFE493C0B4E85BEB434B0F4D2CF782CFDD02DA20EFD093E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692250740712
  • tweetId - 1691741456145252464
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • La FDA n’a en réalité jamais interdit l’usage de l’ivermectine pour le COVID-19 et n’a donc pas changé d’avis. La FDA n’a cependant jamais reconnu l’efficacité du traitement. Aux USA, les médecins sont libres de prescrire des médicaments autorisés, y compris inefficaces. https://t.co/ts3hgRVr76

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-17 05:39:00 UTC
(1692250740712)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-18 02:12:18 UTC
(1692324738224)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-17 11:10:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 09:59:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 09:26:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 09:06:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 08:54:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 08:10:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 06:50:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 06:35:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 06:26:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 04:37:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 03:10:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 02:28:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 02:27:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 02:16:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 02:10:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 00:48:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 00:44:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 18:37:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 06:57:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 06:35:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 02:38:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 00:44:31 -0500 Rating Details