Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-16 17:32:02 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

It is highly misleading for the other notes to claim that the guns were surrendered voluntarily. Even this Vox article (which uses that very same image) describes it as a 'It was one of the largest mandatory gun buyback programs in recent history.' https://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback

Written by 259BDE1EBB59B1ABA55F3938D7DFF8D22CA7CAD7F668B0A902B7E05D92388D37
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1690440606198181888

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1691865413666172950
  • noteId - 1691865413666172950
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 259BDE1EBB59B1ABA55F3938D7DFF8D22CA7CAD7F668B0A902B7E05D92388D37 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692207122615
  • tweetId - 1690440606198181888
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It is highly misleading for the other notes to claim that the guns were surrendered voluntarily. Even this Vox article (which uses that very same image) describes it as a 'It was one of the largest mandatory gun buyback programs in recent history.' https://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-16 17:32:02 UTC
(1692207122615)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-17 02:13:06 UTC
(1692238386519)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-16 15:35:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 14:43:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 13:10:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 13:03:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 05:28:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 13:05:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-02-19 00:56:44 -0600 Rating Details