Birdwatch Note
2023-08-15 18:59:15 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
So we just spam the notes? Guys if y’all see already 1 or more good notes explaining why content isn’t needed what’s the point of typing in another one, let’s do this right.
Written by 5CB2E4000726FE3CD2C1DF304B7BC31056E82BE3BACFF59F9563E068EFEC5E54
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1691195510609334272
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1691524973381181767
- noteId - 1691524973381181767
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5CB2E4000726FE3CD2C1DF304B7BC31056E82BE3BACFF59F9563E068EFEC5E54 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1692125955327
- tweetId - 1691195510609334272
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- So we just spam the notes? Guys if y’all see already 1 or more good notes explaining why content isn’t needed what’s the point of typing in another one, let’s do this right.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-15 18:59:15 UTC (1692125955327) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-16 03:11:19 UTC (1692155479615) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-15 19:00:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 18:11:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 17:02:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 16:02:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 15:38:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 15:37:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 15:24:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 15:06:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 14:58:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 14:44:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 14:39:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 14:23:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 14:18:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 14:12:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 14:10:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 14:06:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 16:50:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 20:02:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 19:43:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 19:30:52 -0500 | Rating Details |