Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-15 17:44:53 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The concept of a "double like" is unfounded; many users joined the trend primarily to gather likes. https://www.latestly.com/social-viral/does-double-tap-give-you-two-likes-on-twitter-posts-users-claim-its-possible-check-tweets-2195892.html/amp

Written by 8E0F634BEF0FCA7B990ED7454DE73DDC7D8D4BB8A5F0779374616FC5F496FCB0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1691338954363076608

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1691506260062212463
  • noteId - 1691506260062212463
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0F634BEF0FCA7B990ED7454DE73DDC7D8D4BB8A5F0779374616FC5F496FCB0 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692121493723
  • tweetId - 1691338954363076608
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The concept of a "double like" is unfounded; many users joined the trend primarily to gather likes. https://www.latestly.com/social-viral/does-double-tap-give-you-two-likes-on-twitter-posts-users-claim-its-possible-check-tweets-2195892.html/amp

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-15 17:44:53 UTC
(1692121493723)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-17 02:13:06 UTC
(1692238386519)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-15 16:52:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 14:26:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 14:22:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 13:16:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 13:06:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 12:59:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 12:51:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 16:43:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 19:32:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 12:46:49 -0500 Rating Details