Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-14 19:41:11 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

“The WHCA has issues with Ateba’s callouts for 2 reasons. 1st obvious is that he's disrupting a Democratic admin. rather than a Rep. one. 2nd reason is, he’s exposing the dirty secret of White House reporting: that the entire system is set up to benefit the legacy media.” https://t.co/kO6rmXWn1l https://t.co/lEvk0fOz5G https://t.co/kT71zqNJjk

Written by A2D1F824188E34E518131401BA18AC467C78DCD14A75C2FBFAB69825AED5E7A0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1690831405863829504

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1691173139114246304
  • noteId - 1691173139114246304
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A2D1F824188E34E518131401BA18AC467C78DCD14A75C2FBFAB69825AED5E7A0 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692042071497
  • tweetId - 1690831405863829504
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • “The WHCA has issues with Ateba’s callouts for 2 reasons. 1st obvious is that he's disrupting a Democratic admin. rather than a Rep. one. 2nd reason is, he’s exposing the dirty secret of White House reporting: that the entire system is set up to benefit the legacy media.” https://t.co/kO6rmXWn1l https://t.co/lEvk0fOz5G https://t.co/kT71zqNJjk

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-14 19:41:11 UTC
(1692042071497)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-15 02:12:56 UTC
(1692065576813)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-14 19:13:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 17:12:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 16:39:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 16:17:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 15:35:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 15:05:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 15:05:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 15:01:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 14:45:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 14:32:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 22:18:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 21:13:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 20:43:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 20:24:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 00:12:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 14:36:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 05:15:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 16:10:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 15:56:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 19:28:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 18:58:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 16:29:19 -0500 Rating Details