Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-13 09:33:41 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Chart showing higher values in the middle for female does not mean female have higher IQ, but there are more females with average IQ than males. Chart showing higher higher values at the edges for males mean there are more males than females with extreme IQ, both high and low.

Written by A3F2F184E8CD6C0ABA42E73E20688F7D838D27DC7A246EE6CC5580871D2F78A3
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1690151986228768768

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1690657868687491470
  • noteId - 1690657868687491470
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A3F2F184E8CD6C0ABA42E73E20688F7D838D27DC7A246EE6CC5580871D2F78A3 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1691919221453
  • tweetId - 1690151986228768768
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Chart showing higher values in the middle for female does not mean female have higher IQ, but there are more females with average IQ than males. Chart showing higher higher values at the edges for males mean there are more males than females with extreme IQ, both high and low.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-13 09:33:41 UTC
(1691919221453)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-14 02:09:58 UTC
(1691978998272)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-13 18:06:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 15:02:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 11:15:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 11:11:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 11:00:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 10:06:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 07:55:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 05:17:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 05:08:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 04:59:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 04:58:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 04:44:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 04:42:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 18:41:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 17:22:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 16:27:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 16:22:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 16:15:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 15:42:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 15:16:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 15:02:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 13:27:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 11:30:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 21:08:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 14:43:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 10:41:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 09:18:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 07:25:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 02:12:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 23:24:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 23:02:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 04:30:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 01:07:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 02:53:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 03:16:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 11:38:49 -0500 Rating Details