Birdwatch Note
2023-08-11 22:26:48 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This “study” has a 41% loss to follow. This is an unacceptably high percent. The standard is 5% or less of loss to follow up; anything over 20% generally results in discarding, not publishing the study https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3427970/
Written by F9A4B5BBB91144ADCC7EAAD07FB11308FADB645F519476915C8F79E8160316E0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1689335807041998848
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1690127655150964923
- noteId - 1690127655150964923
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F9A4B5BBB91144ADCC7EAAD07FB11308FADB645F519476915C8F79E8160316E0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1691792808697
- tweetId - 1689335807041998848
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This “study” has a 41% loss to follow. This is an unacceptably high percent. The standard is 5% or less of loss to follow up; anything over 20% generally results in discarding, not publishing the study https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3427970/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-11 22:26:48 UTC (1691792808697) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-12 02:40:38 UTC (1691808038446) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-11 19:20:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 18:16:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 17:32:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-13 10:54:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-13 09:49:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-13 08:31:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-13 08:11:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-13 08:10:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-13 08:07:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-13 08:06:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-12 15:38:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-12 12:16:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 23:20:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-14 06:11:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-13 20:07:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 15:45:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 05:32:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-15 00:37:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 00:36:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-18 10:59:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-19 21:43:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-21 09:44:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-13 08:16:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-11 20:29:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 15:14:55 -0500 | Rating Details |