Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-11 15:59:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The supreme court ruled in favor of Apple regarding a temporary injunction that would have halt Apple's ability to take a 30% share. Apple still needs to file a supreme court appeal regarding the original 9th circuit ruling and judges need to agree to hear the case. https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-refuses-epic-bid-let-app-store-order-take-effect-apple-case-2023-08-09/ https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/apple-can-keep-app-store-rules-for-now-as-top-court-spurns-epic

Written by 4517224DE6B504C79C198D4388BA1727F707B2B31A49EF9C87B328D9DB12936F
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1690030211360809234
• noteId - 1690030211360809234
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 4517224DE6B504C79C198D4388BA1727F707B2B31A49EF9C87B328D9DB12936F Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1691769576292
• tweetId - 1689391741906960384
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The supreme court ruled in favor of Apple regarding a temporary injunction that would have halt Apple's ability to take a 30% share. Apple still needs to file a supreme court appeal regarding the original 9th circuit ruling and judges need to agree to hear the case. https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-refuses-epic-bid-let-app-store-order-take-effect-apple-case-2023-08-09/ https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/apple-can-keep-app-store-rules-for-now-as-top-court-spurns-epic