Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-10 14:59:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

A jornalista propaga informação falsa. Primeiro, confunde provas para o julgamento de mérito da ação penal com os requisitos da prisão preventiva. Segundo, É FALSO que tenha ocorrido intimidação de testemunha por parte do acusado. Não existe sequer indícios ou acusação disso. https://portal.stf.jus.br/noticias/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=512008&ori=1

Written by 322BFD013AC4B1828C04B38609CF9AAED29F5B7C996A770EB11568BA08735ACC
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1689636897503797248

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1689652769404366957
  • noteId - 1689652769404366957
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 322BFD013AC4B1828C04B38609CF9AAED29F5B7C996A770EB11568BA08735ACC Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1691679587113
  • tweetId - 1689636897503797248
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • A jornalista propaga informação falsa. Primeiro, confunde provas para o julgamento de mérito da ação penal com os requisitos da prisão preventiva. Segundo, É FALSO que tenha ocorrido intimidação de testemunha por parte do acusado. Não existe sequer indícios ou acusação disso. https://portal.stf.jus.br/noticias/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=512008&ori=1

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-10 14:59:47 UTC
(1691679587113)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-11 02:40:29 UTC
(1691721629206)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-10 17:37:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 17:36:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 16:41:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 16:24:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 16:09:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 15:55:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 15:33:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 15:21:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 15:19:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 12:42:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 12:13:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 11:38:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 10:43:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 10:30:41 -0500 Rating Details