Birdwatch Note
2023-08-09 04:49:25 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Both prior notes ultimately refer back to the Lancaster Count report. State says the mistake was Lancaster County, but the County disagreed. It doesn't matter the source of the faulty data, the faulty data was displayed as admitted. https://lancasteronline.com/news/politics/no-lancaster-county-did-not-count-more-mail-in-ballots-than-it-received/article_4f2a853a-1fa1-11eb-aec2-3371757b7a34.html
Written by C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1688992481172463618
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1689136778928652418
- noteId - 1689136778928652418
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1691556565399
- tweetId - 1688992481172463618
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Both prior notes ultimately refer back to the Lancaster Count report. State says the mistake was Lancaster County, but the County disagreed. It doesn't matter the source of the faulty data, the faulty data was displayed as admitted. https://lancasteronline.com/news/politics/no-lancaster-county-did-not-count-more-mail-in-ballots-than-it-received/article_4f2a853a-1fa1-11eb-aec2-3371757b7a34.html
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-09 04:49:25 UTC (1691556565399) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-10 02:12:01 UTC (1691633521783) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-09 19:12:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 08:41:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 08:40:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 05:30:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 03:52:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 03:44:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 02:35:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 02:15:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 02:13:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 01:45:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 01:36:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 01:35:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 01:17:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 00:39:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-09 00:29:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-10 07:31:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-12 03:48:41 -0500 | Rating Details |