Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-09 04:49:25 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Both prior notes ultimately refer back to the Lancaster Count report. State says the mistake was Lancaster County, but the County disagreed. It doesn't matter the source of the faulty data, the faulty data was displayed as admitted. https://lancasteronline.com/news/politics/no-lancaster-county-did-not-count-more-mail-in-ballots-than-it-received/article_4f2a853a-1fa1-11eb-aec2-3371757b7a34.html

Written by C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1688992481172463618

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1689136778928652418
  • noteId - 1689136778928652418
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1691556565399
  • tweetId - 1688992481172463618
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Both prior notes ultimately refer back to the Lancaster Count report. State says the mistake was Lancaster County, but the County disagreed. It doesn't matter the source of the faulty data, the faulty data was displayed as admitted. https://lancasteronline.com/news/politics/no-lancaster-county-did-not-count-more-mail-in-ballots-than-it-received/article_4f2a853a-1fa1-11eb-aec2-3371757b7a34.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-09 04:49:25 UTC
(1691556565399)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-10 02:12:01 UTC
(1691633521783)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-09 19:12:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 08:41:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 08:40:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 05:30:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 03:52:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 03:44:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 02:35:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 02:15:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 02:13:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 01:45:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 01:36:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 01:35:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 01:17:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 00:39:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 00:29:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 07:31:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-12 03:48:41 -0500 Rating Details