Birdwatch Note
2023-08-08 19:58:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no actual endorsement of the moratorium from the IBEW in the letter Smith posted, only that the IBEW would like to use the moratorium as a chance to speak about the use of high skilled labor for all electricity projects and how best to build them. https://twitter.com/ABDanielleSmith/status/1688991763074310144?s=20
Written by 8F35E7EC3E0DC304071F47A5A62A9F631D878DE383B424D953F0A8343654DE35
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1688991763074310144
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1689003272730972166
- noteId - 1689003272730972166
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8F35E7EC3E0DC304071F47A5A62A9F631D878DE383B424D953F0A8343654DE35 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1691524735039
- tweetId - 1688991763074310144
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no actual endorsement of the moratorium from the IBEW in the letter Smith posted, only that the IBEW would like to use the moratorium as a chance to speak about the use of high skilled labor for all electricity projects and how best to build them. https://twitter.com/ABDanielleSmith/status/1688991763074310144?s=20
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-08 19:58:55 UTC (1691524735039) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-09 02:42:39 UTC (1691548959856) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-08-08 19:29:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 19:09:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 18:52:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 18:48:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 18:31:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 18:30:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 17:52:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 17:31:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 17:23:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 17:00:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 16:56:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 16:00:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 15:49:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 15:27:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-09 10:32:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-09 09:22:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-09 07:08:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-09 02:45:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-09 00:07:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 23:11:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 22:46:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 22:15:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 20:10:13 -0500 | Rating Details |