Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-08 03:53:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is an observational study, meaning this data likely contains many confounding factors which could invalidate these statistics. Randomized double-blinded clinical trials have shown no efficacy in treating COVID-19 with ivermectin. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01535-y Clinical Trial vs. Observational study https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11597/#:~:text=Clinical%20studies%20can%20be%20divided,treatment%20based%20on%20clinical%20decisions.

Written by 04E6EA4B2B464CC577760DC11502C2153771EECF6B0431E8C7EC0D6B4F380E89
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1688760325649129751
• noteId - 1688760325649129751
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 04E6EA4B2B464CC577760DC11502C2153771EECF6B0431E8C7EC0D6B4F380E89 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1691466811940
• tweetId - 1686385219728035841
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• This is an observational study, meaning this data likely contains many confounding factors which could invalidate these statistics. Randomized double-blinded clinical trials have shown no efficacy in treating COVID-19 with ivermectin. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01535-y Clinical Trial vs. Observational study https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11597/#:~:text=Clinical%20studies%20can%20be%20divided,treatment%20based%20on%20clinical%20decisions.