Birdwatch Note
2023-08-08 01:17:41 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The wisdom of crowds creates overconfidence in possibly false beliefs. Eg. Enabling a group of anonymous users to edit a Wikipedia page on a sophisticated topic like particle physics, will invariably produce an inadequate product. Wikipedia cannot be trusted. Ever. https://www.wired.com/2011/05/wisdom-of-crowds-decline/ https://blogs.cornell.edu/info2040/2021/11/04/wikipedia-an-unreliable-source/ https://wikipediocracy.com/2022/08/11/wikipedias-credibility-is-toast/ https://internet.gawker.com/how-one-man-made-himself-into-an-aboriginal-god-with-wi-1692426415
Written by 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1688594354896809985
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1688721106000343365
- noteId - 1688721106000343365
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1691457461249
- tweetId - 1688594354896809985
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The wisdom of crowds creates overconfidence in possibly false beliefs. Eg. Enabling a group of anonymous users to edit a Wikipedia page on a sophisticated topic like particle physics, will invariably produce an inadequate product. Wikipedia cannot be trusted. Ever. https://www.wired.com/2011/05/wisdom-of-crowds-decline/ https://blogs.cornell.edu/info2040/2021/11/04/wikipedia-an-unreliable-source/ https://wikipediocracy.com/2022/08/11/wikipedias-credibility-is-toast/ https://internet.gawker.com/how-one-man-made-himself-into-an-aboriginal-god-with-wi-1692426415
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-08 01:17:41 UTC (1691457461249) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-09 02:42:39 UTC (1691548959856) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-08 18:45:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 03:49:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 03:34:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 02:39:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 02:21:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 01:40:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 01:37:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 01:05:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 00:46:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 00:39:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 00:29:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 00:03:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 23:55:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 23:52:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 23:51:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 23:44:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 23:43:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 23:42:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 23:26:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 21:53:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 21:01:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 21:00:04 -0500 | Rating Details |