Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-07 04:35:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The article falsely adds the carbon footprint of gas-fire power stations to offshore wind-farms based on the assumption they're required for peak loads although there are alternative solutions. The Hornsdale Power Reserve in South Australia is an example. https://electrek.co/2018/12/06/tesla-battery-report/

Written by 86F5730D339CDC5F916457236EFC71D745AA39F075F54E98DCB60D427318A9F6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1688369918335668224

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1688408455286227177
  • noteId - 1688408455286227177
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 86F5730D339CDC5F916457236EFC71D745AA39F075F54E98DCB60D427318A9F6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1691382919510
  • tweetId - 1688369918335668224
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The article falsely adds the carbon footprint of gas-fire power stations to offshore wind-farms based on the assumption they're required for peak loads although there are alternative solutions. The Hornsdale Power Reserve in South Australia is an example. https://electrek.co/2018/12/06/tesla-battery-report/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-07 04:35:19 UTC
(1691382919510)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-08 02:42:43 UTC
(1691462563712)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-07 15:01:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 10:15:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 05:26:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 04:01:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 02:17:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 02:14:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 00:57:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 00:51:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 00:01:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 00:00:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 23:59:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 23:53:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 23:50:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 23:44:45 -0500 Rating Details