Birdwatch Note
2023-08-06 02:39:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
誤解を招く可能性のある投稿です。 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%80%E3%82%B5%E3%81%84 「ダサい」の語源が「だって埼玉だもん」とする説は存在しますが、根拠に乏しく、立証されている説ではないことに留意が必要です。
Written by 464DA818E5500A069AB5DB2DE77CC03997EF5CE30C85921BE96C4C0759C35353
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1687972452843081728
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1688016929116848409
- noteId - 1688016929116848409
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 464DA818E5500A069AB5DB2DE77CC03997EF5CE30C85921BE96C4C0759C35353 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1691289572397
- tweetId - 1687972452843081728
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 誤解を招く可能性のある投稿です。 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%80%E3%82%B5%E3%81%84 「ダサい」の語源が「だって埼玉だもん」とする説は存在しますが、根拠に乏しく、立証されている説ではないことに留意が必要です。
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-06 02:39:32 UTC (1691289572397) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-07 02:42:31 UTC (1691376151965) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-06 07:21:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 07:16:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 07:14:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 07:13:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 07:08:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 07:05:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 06:42:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 06:31:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 06:26:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 06:17:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 06:13:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 06:08:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 05:48:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 05:39:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 04:44:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 04:40:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 04:15:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 02:38:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 01:58:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 00:54:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 00:24:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 00:20:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 00:18:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 23:25:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 23:16:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 22:51:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 22:46:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 22:45:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 22:41:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 22:39:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 22:27:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 22:09:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 22:00:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 22:00:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 21:59:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 21:47:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-08 05:17:47 -0500 | Rating Details |