Birdwatch Note
2023-08-05 19:18:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The Guardian has failed numerous fact checks over the years. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/ It is not based on facts because the bill has nothing to do about abortion. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/first-reading-bill-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-abortion-denounced-as-anti-choice-by-trudeau-cabinet/wcm/e35748af-cd43-427b-8146-ad351e3a7ae2/amp/ The CPC does not have to respond because the bill has nothing to abortion, therefore why would they?
Written by 053457536A51EA268CE0F85B5F2FE964FAC08009C63DE36E437797EDF71BC1D8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1687868194688503808
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1687905906690805995
- noteId - 1687905906690805995
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 053457536A51EA268CE0F85B5F2FE964FAC08009C63DE36E437797EDF71BC1D8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1691263102588
- tweetId - 1687868194688503808
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Guardian has failed numerous fact checks over the years. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/ It is not based on facts because the bill has nothing to do about abortion. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/first-reading-bill-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-abortion-denounced-as-anti-choice-by-trudeau-cabinet/wcm/e35748af-cd43-427b-8146-ad351e3a7ae2/amp/ The CPC does not have to respond because the bill has nothing to abortion, therefore why would they?
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-05 19:18:22 UTC (1691263102588) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-06 02:39:59 UTC (1691289599323) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-05 18:40:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 18:25:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 18:03:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 17:53:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 17:07:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 17:00:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 16:47:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 16:45:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 16:20:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 16:18:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 16:04:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 16:03:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 15:49:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 14:50:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 14:42:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 14:39:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 14:37:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 14:29:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 14:20:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 16:54:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 13:27:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 13:09:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 10:16:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 08:51:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 07:55:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 07:42:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 07:28:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 03:44:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 02:19:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 01:50:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 01:25:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 01:17:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 00:05:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 23:58:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 22:57:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 21:42:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 21:37:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 21:16:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 20:31:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 20:21:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-05 20:13:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-07 19:35:30 -0500 | Rating Details |