Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-05 19:18:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Guardian has failed numerous fact checks over the years. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/ It is not based on facts because the bill has nothing to do about abortion. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/first-reading-bill-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-abortion-denounced-as-anti-choice-by-trudeau-cabinet/wcm/e35748af-cd43-427b-8146-ad351e3a7ae2/amp/ The CPC does not have to respond because the bill has nothing to abortion, therefore why would they?

Written by 053457536A51EA268CE0F85B5F2FE964FAC08009C63DE36E437797EDF71BC1D8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1687868194688503808

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1687905906690805995
  • noteId - 1687905906690805995
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 053457536A51EA268CE0F85B5F2FE964FAC08009C63DE36E437797EDF71BC1D8 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1691263102588
  • tweetId - 1687868194688503808
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Guardian has failed numerous fact checks over the years. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/ It is not based on facts because the bill has nothing to do about abortion. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/first-reading-bill-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-abortion-denounced-as-anti-choice-by-trudeau-cabinet/wcm/e35748af-cd43-427b-8146-ad351e3a7ae2/amp/ The CPC does not have to respond because the bill has nothing to abortion, therefore why would they?

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-05 19:18:22 UTC
(1691263102588)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-06 02:39:59 UTC
(1691289599323)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-05 18:40:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 18:25:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 18:03:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 17:53:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 17:07:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 17:00:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 16:47:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 16:45:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 16:20:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 16:18:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 16:04:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 16:03:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 15:49:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 14:50:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 14:42:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 14:39:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 14:37:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 14:29:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 14:20:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 16:54:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 13:27:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 13:09:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 10:16:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 08:51:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 07:55:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 07:42:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 07:28:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 03:44:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 02:19:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 01:50:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 01:25:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 01:17:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 00:05:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 23:58:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 22:57:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 21:42:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 21:37:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 21:16:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 20:31:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 20:21:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 20:13:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 19:35:30 -0500 Rating Details