Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-05 09:43:33 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

To say that the President is ultimately r the decision maker for the DOJ’s actions is not accurate. It’s pretty complex. See page 4: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5588&context=flr It’s also possible that the Jan 6th Committee had a role in deciding whether this latest indictment should be considered: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/08/01/trump-indictment-jan-6-committee-00109235

Written by EB047EBC8B747BB43BD68D0C51957ECACBCA2BA47814A7CCEF8A37A44A54A617
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1687496577613541376

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1687761251018162378
  • noteId - 1687761251018162378
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - EB047EBC8B747BB43BD68D0C51957ECACBCA2BA47814A7CCEF8A37A44A54A617 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1691228613988
  • tweetId - 1687496577613541376
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • To say that the President is ultimately r the decision maker for the DOJ’s actions is not accurate. It’s pretty complex. See page 4: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5588&context=flr It’s also possible that the Jan 6th Committee had a role in deciding whether this latest indictment should be considered: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/08/01/trump-indictment-jan-6-committee-00109235

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-05 09:43:33 UTC
(1691228613988)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-06 02:39:59 UTC
(1691289599323)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-05 12:00:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 11:20:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 10:56:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 10:56:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 10:56:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 08:59:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 07:57:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 07:30:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 06:36:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 06:05:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 05:58:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 05:39:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 05:23:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 05:19:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 04:50:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 01:11:06 -0500 Rating Details