Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-04 12:43:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It is not possible to objectively measure how nasty Joe Biden's face is in this video. Therefore this is an appeal to emotion fallacy, a type of emotional manipulation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion

Written by 38B4CCB5F6D1E18A311F5B1A91439266326DA8A1C4C99BCB1D8EC39F43B369C4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1687205542417313793

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1687444268204359680
  • noteId - 1687444268204359680
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 38B4CCB5F6D1E18A311F5B1A91439266326DA8A1C4C99BCB1D8EC39F43B369C4 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1691153039394
  • tweetId - 1687205542417313793
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • It is not possible to objectively measure how nasty Joe Biden's face is in this video. Therefore this is an appeal to emotion fallacy, a type of emotional manipulation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-04 12:43:59 UTC
(1691153039394)
2023-08-04 16:09:33 UTC
(1691165373293)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-08-05 02:12:26 UTC
(1691201546790)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-08-04 16:09:33 UTC
(1691165373293)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-04 14:01:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 13:41:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 13:35:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 13:07:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 11:51:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 11:44:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 11:14:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 11:11:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 11:06:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 10:51:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 10:23:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 10:13:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:55:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:32:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:25:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:24:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:22:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:22:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:21:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:10:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:09:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:04:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:02:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 09:00:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 08:53:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 08:33:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 08:24:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 08:23:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 08:22:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 07:48:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 07:47:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 07:45:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-05 22:07:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-07 07:53:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 03:31:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 13:07:58 -0500 Rating Details