Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-03 03:37:08 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Notes saying ‘no evidence’ are never needed Unless you have searched everywhere possible or done a proof, saying ‘no evidence’ is not rigorous .

Written by 1B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1686786311540162577

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1686944263136071680
  • noteId - 1686944263136071680
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1691033828897
  • tweetId - 1686786311540162577
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Notes saying ‘no evidence’ are never needed Unless you have searched everywhere possible or done a proof, saying ‘no evidence’ is not rigorous .

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-03 03:37:08 UTC
(1691033828897)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-04 02:12:18 UTC
(1691115138484)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-03 11:15:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 11:07:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 10:23:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 10:02:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 10:02:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 09:27:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 09:04:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 08:41:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 07:44:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 07:10:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 06:27:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 04:22:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 04:11:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 04:01:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 03:49:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 03:42:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 03:05:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 02:48:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 02:22:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 01:51:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 01:37:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 01:31:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 01:28:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 01:28:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 01:00:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 00:59:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 00:19:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 00:18:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 00:12:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-03 00:01:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-02 23:47:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-02 23:24:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-02 23:16:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-02 23:15:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-02 22:55:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-02 22:51:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-02 22:41:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 02:56:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 21:54:38 -0500 Rating Details