Birdwatch Note
2023-08-02 23:34:46 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This tweet is contradictory. If the Premier League club who bested Chelsea's bid is confidential & the identity unknown, then Liverpool COULD be the anonymous club. Additionally, it makes no sense that Brighton would directly approach Caicedo's camp over a bid that's "not real".
Written by 4DD52DD8514E7F8FEBEA4FEB78F6EA5A058E334787401E41D4E82F55111B3592
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1686786903784275968
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1686883267549528064
- noteId - 1686883267549528064
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4DD52DD8514E7F8FEBEA4FEB78F6EA5A058E334787401E41D4E82F55111B3592 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1691019286416
- tweetId - 1686786903784275968
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- This tweet is contradictory. If the Premier League club who bested Chelsea's bid is confidential & the identity unknown, then Liverpool COULD be the anonymous club. Additionally, it makes no sense that Brighton would directly approach Caicedo's camp over a bid that's "not real".
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-02 23:34:46 UTC (1691019286416) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-03 01:38:31 UTC (1691026711144) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-08-02 18:58:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-02 18:56:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 06:21:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 04:15:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 03:47:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 03:44:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 03:36:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 03:31:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 03:15:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 00:18:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-02 20:58:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-02 20:20:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-02 19:42:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-02 19:37:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-10 05:27:31 -0500 | Rating Details |