Birdwatch Note
2023-08-02 22:41:56 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The following tweet states that you have “photographic memory” If you name 16/30 pictures, which is a false claim. This claim is only said that more people would click on the link. Photographic memory was never proven to exist so it’s a misleading ad. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/i-developed-what-appears-to-be-a-ph/#:~:text=The%20intuitive%20notion%20of%20a,never%20been%20proved%20to%20exist.
Written by 61DFC8A1D113045E7C8F6C5F079904F6453A837A1AF462AAADD3F31A2A8A48EA
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1682459952303013892
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1686869971937222656
- noteId - 1686869971937222656
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 61DFC8A1D113045E7C8F6C5F079904F6453A837A1AF462AAADD3F31A2A8A48EA Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1691016116494
- tweetId - 1682459952303013892
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The following tweet states that you have “photographic memory” If you name 16/30 pictures, which is a false claim. This claim is only said that more people would click on the link. Photographic memory was never proven to exist so it’s a misleading ad. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/i-developed-what-appears-to-be-a-ph/#:~:text=The%20intuitive%20notion%20of%20a,never%20been%20proved%20to%20exist.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-02 22:41:56 UTC (1691016116494) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-03 01:38:31 UTC (1691026711144) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-08-02 17:47:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-02 17:45:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-02 17:45:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-02 17:42:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 17:59:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 15:26:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 09:41:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-02 20:43:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-05 06:41:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-08 09:26:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-07 23:40:23 -0500 | Rating Details |