Birdwatch Note
2023-07-30 22:06:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Não há qualquer evidência de que a CBF "escolheu" o Botafogo para ser campeão brasileiro. A afirmação é grave e necessita de embasamentos. O Botafogo, com todos os méritos, é líder da competição. Confira a tabela: https://ge.globo.com/futebol/brasileirao-serie-a/
Written by 8785E7BC72F4EFBC92685C93A7545102425081920BFDFC63420AC7F0353D1085
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1685739398887878656
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1685773917099556864
- noteId - 1685773917099556864
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8785E7BC72F4EFBC92685C93A7545102425081920BFDFC63420AC7F0353D1085 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1690754796660
- tweetId - 1685739398887878656
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Não há qualquer evidência de que a CBF "escolheu" o Botafogo para ser campeão brasileiro. A afirmação é grave e necessita de embasamentos. O Botafogo, com todos os méritos, é líder da competição. Confira a tabela: https://ge.globo.com/futebol/brasileirao-serie-a/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-07-30 22:06:36 UTC (1690754796660) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-31 02:12:18 UTC (1690769538949) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-07-30 18:44:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 18:18:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 18:10:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 18:04:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 17:49:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 17:28:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 17:27:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-31 12:31:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-31 06:12:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-31 02:46:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-31 02:31:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 23:11:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 21:58:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 21:45:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 21:24:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 21:14:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 20:58:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 20:51:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 20:51:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 20:47:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 20:47:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 20:28:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-30 19:32:47 -0500 | Rating Details |