Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-30 16:25:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The community note as currently written leaves out one of the two main arguments for the Ukrainians to change their opinion on negotiations, and misrepresents the other. As the linked article says, the first argument was the discovery of the Russian troops terrible conduct.

Written by 02AFADC4853919E920A64DC51A7C88D62AE1299B40F3841F044A13AEBF1212D2
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1685520784658481152

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1685688128059666433
  • noteId - 1685688128059666433
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 02AFADC4853919E920A64DC51A7C88D62AE1299B40F3841F044A13AEBF1212D2 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1690734342959
  • tweetId - 1685520784658481152
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The community note as currently written leaves out one of the two main arguments for the Ukrainians to change their opinion on negotiations, and misrepresents the other. As the linked article says, the first argument was the discovery of the Russian troops terrible conduct.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-30 16:25:42 UTC
(1690734342959)
2023-07-30 21:10:32 UTC
(1690751432410)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-07-31 02:12:18 UTC
(1690769538949)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-07-30 21:10:32 UTC
(1690751432410)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-30 16:58:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 15:49:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 15:45:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 15:35:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 15:20:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 15:00:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 14:54:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 14:18:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 14:15:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 13:58:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 13:44:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 13:02:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 12:43:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-31 00:09:12 -0500 Rating Details