Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-29 22:53:20 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The tweet in question never refers to Niger, neither does it attempt to make an explicit claim or comparison about the current coup. It quotes a Burkinabe general who refers to a historically verifiable massacre of West African veterans by French forces: https://www.persee.fr/doc/homig_1142-852x_2002_num_1235_1_3780 Argue in the thread.

Written by 88F22A36157C81D7B1BA61A3BBBC46D6F66964119D77F753A489F1824C804FE7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1685295931254833152

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1685423290054029313
  • noteId - 1685423290054029313
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 88F22A36157C81D7B1BA61A3BBBC46D6F66964119D77F753A489F1824C804FE7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1690671200655
  • tweetId - 1685295931254833152
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The tweet in question never refers to Niger, neither does it attempt to make an explicit claim or comparison about the current coup. It quotes a Burkinabe general who refers to a historically verifiable massacre of West African veterans by French forces: https://www.persee.fr/doc/homig_1142-852x_2002_num_1235_1_3780 Argue in the thread.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-29 22:53:20 UTC
(1690671200655)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-30 02:15:25 UTC
(1690683325061)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-29 19:06:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 18:24:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 18:13:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 18:12:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 16:09:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 06:17:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 05:59:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 05:36:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 05:27:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 05:02:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 03:56:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 02:48:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 01:24:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 23:13:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 22:44:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 21:52:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 21:45:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 21:45:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 21:41:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 20:59:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 20:33:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 20:24:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 20:21:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 20:19:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 20:03:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 19:48:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 19:42:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-01 14:19:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-31 22:29:22 -0500 Rating Details