Birdwatch Note
2023-07-28 16:45:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
No she is not.
Written by 417F3C9545AEB52ECA7780E80043E1CBC639024B7510403C9DACA8AAA3594821
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1684676586954469376
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1684968388676788227
- noteId - 1684968388676788227
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 417F3C9545AEB52ECA7780E80043E1CBC639024B7510403C9DACA8AAA3594821 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1690562743714
- tweetId - 1684676586954469376
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- No she is not.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-07-28 16:45:43 UTC (1690562743714) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-29 02:10:10 UTC (1690596610739) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |