Birdwatch Note
2023-07-28 12:29:52 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
For context, 0nly 4% of SARs are considered worthy of being looked up by law enforcement, and only a fraction of these are ever prosecuted. https://bpi.com/the-truth-about-suspicious-activity-reports/ Also, It's misleading to state that the SAR was because trafficking or laundering etc. Because nobody knows why they were filed.
Written by 481D0AD0EBA3E2E3428E118D60051058C4D61094109D170A1D1221EB5C23E7C7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1684691742853849088
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1684904002536759296
- noteId - 1684904002536759296
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 481D0AD0EBA3E2E3428E118D60051058C4D61094109D170A1D1221EB5C23E7C7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1690547392865
- tweetId - 1684691742853849088
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- For context, 0nly 4% of SARs are considered worthy of being looked up by law enforcement, and only a fraction of these are ever prosecuted. https://bpi.com/the-truth-about-suspicious-activity-reports/ Also, It's misleading to state that the SAR was because trafficking or laundering etc. Because nobody knows why they were filed.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-07-28 12:29:52 UTC (1690547392865) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-29 02:10:10 UTC (1690596610739) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-07-28 15:49:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 15:32:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 15:16:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 10:48:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 10:12:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 09:18:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 07:49:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 07:47:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 07:38:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 22:25:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 22:16:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 22:02:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-28 20:44:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-31 23:48:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-02 09:44:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 19:03:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 10:01:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-03 08:58:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-11 03:20:15 -0500 | Rating Details |