Birdwatch Note
2023-07-27 22:02:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Some people may interpret the expression 6/2(1+2) as being 6/(2*(1+2)) due to how it's written. If we follow this interpretation, the result would be 1. But this interpretation is contrary to the standard order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS/BIDMA). Here, the correct answer is 9.
Written by 9A3BC21FA55A60F1BF2A74F03619D73976136624B48F65DA870DB8F039B15BA0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1684198563130097665
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1684685728356151299
- noteId - 1684685728356151299
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9A3BC21FA55A60F1BF2A74F03619D73976136624B48F65DA870DB8F039B15BA0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1690495352243
- tweetId - 1684198563130097665
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Some people may interpret the expression 6/2(1+2) as being 6/(2*(1+2)) due to how it's written. If we follow this interpretation, the result would be 1. But this interpretation is contrary to the standard order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS/BIDMA). Here, the correct answer is 9.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-07-27 22:02:32 UTC (1690495352243) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-28 02:13:08 UTC (1690510388150) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-07-27 18:52:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 18:29:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 18:24:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 18:12:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:47:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:32:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:24:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:19:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:18:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:15:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:14:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:09:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:06:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:06:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:05:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 17:05:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-28 11:27:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-28 09:10:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-28 07:53:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-28 06:39:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-28 06:19:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-28 05:41:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-28 05:00:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-28 03:21:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-28 03:00:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-28 02:29:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 23:25:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-27 21:28:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-29 08:02:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-29 03:44:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-30 13:11:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-30 00:52:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-03 03:50:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-17 18:05:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-17 00:31:39 -0500 | Rating Details |