Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-25 06:25:18 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

It's a close case here, but all things considered, I would say NNN. 1. The quote itself is accurate. 2. In his reaction, Asmongold only said there were "exceptions and edge cases" https://twitter.com/asmongold/status/1683570242612523009 Therefore the tweet is generally accurate and the conclusion it draws is a personal opinion.

Written by F4C3EC989AB12CE380BF48360631F94798614D2BFD04861248D3D3F62C1BFCF8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1683522681549856775

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1683725090607726593
  • noteId - 1683725090607726593
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F4C3EC989AB12CE380BF48360631F94798614D2BFD04861248D3D3F62C1BFCF8 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1690266318357
  • tweetId - 1683522681549856775
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It's a close case here, but all things considered, I would say NNN. 1. The quote itself is accurate. 2. In his reaction, Asmongold only said there were "exceptions and edge cases" https://twitter.com/asmongold/status/1683570242612523009 Therefore the tweet is generally accurate and the conclusion it draws is a personal opinion.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-25 06:25:18 UTC
(1690266318357)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-26 02:11:25 UTC
(1690337485071)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-25 07:06:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-25 05:08:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-25 03:07:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-25 03:03:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-25 02:24:45 -0500 Rating Details