Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-24 20:14:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Tweet very misleading as is The NY Times headline for article. Take a look at the reviews in May. Only 5 with 1 not a one star. Honestly, is this actually “review-bombing” or as NY Times wrote in article title “ flood” of bad reviews. https://yelp.com/biz/deans-car-care-portland

Written by E13721D06789B0E6FAF7E9EDA2FED8A7725E4CBDAB0C8C15C787F25DE8F7ADFD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1683145506002993152

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1683571406645149697
  • noteId - 1683571406645149697
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E13721D06789B0E6FAF7E9EDA2FED8A7725E4CBDAB0C8C15C787F25DE8F7ADFD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1690229677245
  • tweetId - 1683145506002993152
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Tweet very misleading as is The NY Times headline for article. Take a look at the reviews in May. Only 5 with 1 not a one star. Honestly, is this actually “review-bombing” or as NY Times wrote in article title “ flood” of bad reviews. https://yelp.com/biz/deans-car-care-portland

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-24 20:14:37 UTC
(1690229677245)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-25 02:10:02 UTC
(1690251002506)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-24 18:09:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-24 17:33:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-24 16:57:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-24 15:55:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-24 15:48:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-24 15:44:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-24 15:35:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-24 15:18:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-25 16:46:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-26 21:57:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-26 19:46:33 -0500 Rating Details