Birdwatch Note
2023-07-24 13:11:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The US government at the time believed that Japan would not surrender and the continuation of the war would be costly for both sides. https://www.nps.gov/articles/trumanatomicbomb.htm https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/06/03/atomic-bomb-oppenheimer-hiroshima-nagasaki-world-war-ii-history/ The revisionist view that Japan would have surrendered without the bombing does not have strong evidence. https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/history/debate-over-japanese-surrender/#:~:text=The%20other%20piece,the%20Hiroshima%20bombing.
Written by 3081CC1AF08CF496B9AC7BE8C8BDF1108C753934F06590D79355F31A9D98239B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1424879163882803206
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1683465008842174464
- noteId - 1683465008842174464
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3081CC1AF08CF496B9AC7BE8C8BDF1108C753934F06590D79355F31A9D98239B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1690204310031
- tweetId - 1424879163882803206
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The US government at the time believed that Japan would not surrender and the continuation of the war would be costly for both sides. https://www.nps.gov/articles/trumanatomicbomb.htm https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/06/03/atomic-bomb-oppenheimer-hiroshima-nagasaki-world-war-ii-history/ The revisionist view that Japan would have surrendered without the bombing does not have strong evidence. https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/history/debate-over-japanese-surrender/#:~:text=The%20other%20piece,the%20Hiroshima%20bombing.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-07-24 13:11:50 UTC (1690204310031) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-25 02:10:02 UTC (1690251002506) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-07-24 17:32:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-24 16:38:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-24 09:43:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-24 09:33:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-24 08:29:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-25 09:03:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-25 08:24:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-25 08:22:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-25 08:10:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-25 06:54:29 -0500 | Rating Details |