Birdwatch Note
2023-07-22 14:35:51 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Personne n'a affirmé qu'il était scientifique il s'agit d'une opinion personnelle
Written by 6F1044DE9C3586E5EC4D5C78241CA7A2E1130B66BB9E085782D0B55E41F1F7FA
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1682490673965027329
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1682761377671266304
- noteId - 1682761377671266304
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6F1044DE9C3586E5EC4D5C78241CA7A2E1130B66BB9E085782D0B55E41F1F7FA Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1690036551291
- tweetId - 1682490673965027329
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Personne n'a affirmé qu'il était scientifique il s'agit d'une opinion personnelle
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-07-22 14:35:51 UTC (1690036551291) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-23 04:10:19 UTC (1690085419289) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-07-22 12:14:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-22 09:45:55 -0500 | Rating Details |