Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-22 12:09:11 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Dan Wootton denies these accusations and is pursuing legal action over them for defamation. https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1681400646824542214?s=20 The proposed note does not mention this key point, making it seem biased. Also, repeating the accusations in a note adds nothing to this particular tweet, which is just opinion.

Written by 1CA13243E19AFFC653F41161B15FC7474513342B443C26B00AFCB1CBF12DA202
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1682494674135658496

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1682724467737346051
  • noteId - 1682724467737346051
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1CA13243E19AFFC653F41161B15FC7474513342B443C26B00AFCB1CBF12DA202 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1690027751275
  • tweetId - 1682494674135658496
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Dan Wootton denies these accusations and is pursuing legal action over them for defamation. https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1681400646824542214?s=20 The proposed note does not mention this key point, making it seem biased. Also, repeating the accusations in a note adds nothing to this particular tweet, which is just opinion.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-22 12:09:11 UTC
(1690027751275)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-23 04:10:19 UTC
(1690085419289)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-22 17:08:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 15:30:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 14:25:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 13:56:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 12:50:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 12:14:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 11:17:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 11:08:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 10:44:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 10:32:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 10:12:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 09:32:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 09:32:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 09:02:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 08:41:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 07:43:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 07:35:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 07:24:28 -0500 Rating Details