Birdwatch Note
2023-07-21 15:14:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is false. The religion of the purchaser does not affect whether they pay the duty. If the purchaser uses Islamic financing (most Muslims do not, and non-Muslims can) the bank pays the Stamp Duty and the purchaser repays the bank. They pay the same amount in the end. https://www.taxpolicy.org.uk/2023/07/19/islamicfinance/
Written by 015EF949CC561DD1C4D9D280A412D22A8B38286592F6F7EDB1F2996F2613D350
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1681008547067314176
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1682408690509312002
- noteId - 1682408690509312002
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 015EF949CC561DD1C4D9D280A412D22A8B38286592F6F7EDB1F2996F2613D350 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1689952464118
- tweetId - 1681008547067314176
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is false. The religion of the purchaser does not affect whether they pay the duty. If the purchaser uses Islamic financing (most Muslims do not, and non-Muslims can) the bank pays the Stamp Duty and the purchaser repays the bank. They pay the same amount in the end. https://www.taxpolicy.org.uk/2023/07/19/islamicfinance/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-07-21 15:14:24 UTC (1689952464118) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-22 02:12:19 UTC (1689991939774) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-07-21 18:58:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 18:40:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 12:03:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 11:51:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 11:35:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 11:27:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 10:55:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 10:43:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 10:27:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 10:25:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 10:22:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 10:15:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-22 17:46:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 22:25:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 21:19:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 21:00:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 20:45:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 20:38:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 20:24:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-21 19:52:34 -0500 | Rating Details |