Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-21 10:37:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN It's pedantic to argue about whether the Hunter images constitute "porn", but it's not even Technically Correct because the original poster never claimed that THOSE images were porn, only that Democrats want to make porn available in schools.

Written by 4D93BE2679AE555CD06FD5781A131E3BB6C3FE275A681D1E797095F8730097A0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1681763859139293189

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1682339040639569927
  • noteId - 1682339040639569927
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4D93BE2679AE555CD06FD5781A131E3BB6C3FE275A681D1E797095F8730097A0 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689935858293
  • tweetId - 1681763859139293189
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN It's pedantic to argue about whether the Hunter images constitute "porn", but it's not even Technically Correct because the original poster never claimed that THOSE images were porn, only that Democrats want to make porn available in schools.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-21 10:37:38 UTC
(1689935858293)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-22 02:12:19 UTC
(1689991939774)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-21 15:32:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 13:00:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 12:37:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 06:21:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 05:57:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 22:49:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-23 13:50:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-23 02:19:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-23 02:15:19 -0500 Rating Details