Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-21 08:52:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It is worth noting what the performance of Chamath's SPACs is, an article analyzing the performance states: "If you followed Chamath Palihapitiya into the SPAC boom, you lost money. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chamath-palihapitiya-crumbling-spac-empire-100748788.html

Written by 5AD7B21F7D1F56985313118DC9670A0395C21CBA35A235B160E99AF105EFA94C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1682309808207085568

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1682312706831917056
  • noteId - 1682312706831917056
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5AD7B21F7D1F56985313118DC9670A0395C21CBA35A235B160E99AF105EFA94C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689929579826
  • tweetId - 1682309808207085568
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It is worth noting what the performance of Chamath's SPACs is, an article analyzing the performance states: "If you followed Chamath Palihapitiya into the SPAC boom, you lost money. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chamath-palihapitiya-crumbling-spac-empire-100748788.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-21 08:52:59 UTC
(1689929579826)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-22 02:12:19 UTC
(1689991939774)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-21 18:04:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 17:50:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 16:35:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 15:50:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 14:14:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 11:30:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 08:11:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 08:00:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 07:20:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 06:51:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 06:48:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 06:47:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 04:24:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 04:05:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 03:58:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 07:56:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-23 05:00:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 07:51:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-10 19:52:22 -0500 Rating Details