Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-20 22:45:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It don't matter if it doesn't say "slaves benefited from slavery" or they wouldn't make such a change to the lessons. The point is they're trying to water down slavery to provide the fact "some" skills was taught that helped them be better slaves and it wasn't reading or writing

Written by FF2631B275111140BBB093ECF3B1866F0D79594AA0CC6FF7F7F67FFA7BB37CC7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1682104959934799872

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1682159787516076032
  • noteId - 1682159787516076032
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FF2631B275111140BBB093ECF3B1866F0D79594AA0CC6FF7F7F67FFA7BB37CC7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689893121023
  • tweetId - 1682104959934799872
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It don't matter if it doesn't say "slaves benefited from slavery" or they wouldn't make such a change to the lessons. The point is they're trying to water down slavery to provide the fact "some" skills was taught that helped them be better slaves and it wasn't reading or writing

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-20 22:45:21 UTC
(1689893121023)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-21 03:11:08 UTC
(1689909068910)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-20 19:37:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 19:25:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 19:10:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 19:00:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 19:00:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 18:40:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 18:36:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 18:33:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 18:33:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 17:49:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 07:39:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 05:51:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 05:24:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 05:14:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 04:45:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 04:21:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 02:34:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 02:32:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 01:32:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 01:06:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 00:20:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 22:53:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 22:08:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 21:16:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 20:52:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 20:51:22 -0500 Rating Details