Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-20 15:14:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Se hacen afirmaciones obvias (En España hay sequía) o inexactas, como el turismo abusivo. No se aceptan respuestas de todos los lectores, eso no es correcto. Habrá quien tenga otro análisis. Se afirma que todos los políticos mienten. Solo la ong tiene la solución: no es creible.

Written by 341D39A433D6E0D17D5246CE301FBE21D44F23EED7CD9ED6DD38105C63592F84
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1680912225119158272

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1682046209828212738
  • noteId - 1682046209828212738
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 341D39A433D6E0D17D5246CE301FBE21D44F23EED7CD9ED6DD38105C63592F84 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689866041988
  • tweetId - 1680912225119158272
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Se hacen afirmaciones obvias (En España hay sequía) o inexactas, como el turismo abusivo. No se aceptan respuestas de todos los lectores, eso no es correcto. Habrá quien tenga otro análisis. Se afirma que todos los políticos mienten. Solo la ong tiene la solución: no es creible.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-20 15:14:01 UTC
(1689866041988)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-21 03:11:08 UTC
(1689909068910)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-20 17:53:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 15:18:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 12:16:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 11:30:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 11:21:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 10:23:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 16:10:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 01:12:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-23 06:12:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-25 11:11:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-25 10:22:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-25 09:47:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-25 08:10:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-25 07:11:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-24 19:39:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-26 09:22:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-26 08:20:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-26 04:44:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 05:40:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 01:26:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 00:15:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 00:07:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 00:06:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 23:40:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 22:37:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 22:12:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 21:57:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-27 21:54:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-25 13:49:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 06:20:52 -0500 Rating Details