Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-20 05:14:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The Bloomberg article, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-19/twitter-s-surge-in-harmful-content-a-barrier-to-advertiser-return references numerous reliable third party researchers, whereas the responses saying this tweet is inaccurate reference only statements from Twitter itself. Twitter would need neutral third-party research for their claims of improvements to be credible.

Written by 8DD9C87DC4E3A832B0EE9433BDF31D81A4910F07625582E1D77A17ED3095692F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1681656069158850561

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1681895319557263360
  • noteId - 1681895319557263360
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8DD9C87DC4E3A832B0EE9433BDF31D81A4910F07625582E1D77A17ED3095692F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689830066944
  • tweetId - 1681656069158850561
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Bloomberg article, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-19/twitter-s-surge-in-harmful-content-a-barrier-to-advertiser-return references numerous reliable third party researchers, whereas the responses saying this tweet is inaccurate reference only statements from Twitter itself. Twitter would need neutral third-party research for their claims of improvements to be credible.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-20 05:14:26 UTC
(1689830066944)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-21 03:11:08 UTC
(1689909068910)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-20 04:15:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 01:49:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 01:38:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 01:34:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 01:06:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 00:56:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 00:54:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 00:27:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 00:22:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 00:14:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-22 18:52:17 -0500 Rating Details