Birdwatch Note
2023-07-17 20:17:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
For starters "Trickle Down" economics doesn't exist and is misleading to repeat that over and over: https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasdelbeccaro/2018/01/04/trickle-down-economics-does-not-exist-the-benefits-of-capitalism-do/ https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-attack-trickle-down-economics-it-doesn-t-exist-and-never-has-done/ What is known to produce positive economic results is Supply-side Economics: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/supply-sidetheory.asp#:~:text=The%20supply%2Dside%20theory%2C%20or,tax%20cuts%20and%20reduced%20regulation. And what the government tweet refers to as R&D is actually applied research: https://www.science.org/content/article/applied-research-gets-starring-role-biden-s-2022-budget
Written by 9E38E570344B672BD8CF681B7717D26FD9A7E3BADE34B9DEB556830CEFDD3B92
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1681032274064580612
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1681035441703723008
- noteId - 1681035441703723008
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9E38E570344B672BD8CF681B7717D26FD9A7E3BADE34B9DEB556830CEFDD3B92 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1689625056088
- tweetId - 1681032274064580612
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- For starters "Trickle Down" economics doesn't exist and is misleading to repeat that over and over: https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasdelbeccaro/2018/01/04/trickle-down-economics-does-not-exist-the-benefits-of-capitalism-do/ https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-attack-trickle-down-economics-it-doesn-t-exist-and-never-has-done/ What is known to produce positive economic results is Supply-side Economics: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/supply-sidetheory.asp#:~:text=The%20supply%2Dside%20theory%2C%20or,tax%20cuts%20and%20reduced%20regulation. And what the government tweet refers to as R&D is actually applied research: https://www.science.org/content/article/applied-research-gets-starring-role-biden-s-2022-budget
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-07-17 20:17:36 UTC (1689625056088) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-18 02:11:03 UTC (1689646263914) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-07-17 19:01:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 18:56:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 18:42:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 18:18:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 18:18:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 17:57:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 17:28:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 17:12:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 16:57:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 16:51:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 16:48:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 16:15:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 16:09:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 16:07:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 16:00:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:57:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:50:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:47:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:47:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:41:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:36:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:29:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:28:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:27:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:26:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:24:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:24:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:24:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 15:22:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 18:48:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 12:51:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 11:24:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 11:14:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 11:07:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 07:08:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 06:53:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 06:33:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 06:28:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 05:27:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 03:51:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 01:14:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 23:56:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 22:10:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 20:03:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-17 19:58:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 22:23:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-18 20:07:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-23 05:43:31 -0500 | Rating Details |