Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-17 10:47:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

No es cierto que la oposición tenga el récord de corrupción, ni que los datos de empleo sean ciertos al incluirse los fijos discontinuos. https://www.hispanidad.com/politica/espana/psoe-partido-mas-corrupto-espana-71-andaluces-rechaza-indultar-grinan-por-caso-ere_12037744_102.html

Written by 7D935C678C5FB038063668CF9BE2B2317D05402B5B3811A3127007B2E82C04D3
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1680823502700519424

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1680892057437495297
  • noteId - 1680892057437495297
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7D935C678C5FB038063668CF9BE2B2317D05402B5B3811A3127007B2E82C04D3 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689590870615
  • tweetId - 1680823502700519424
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • No es cierto que la oposición tenga el récord de corrupción, ni que los datos de empleo sean ciertos al incluirse los fijos discontinuos. https://www.hispanidad.com/politica/espana/psoe-partido-mas-corrupto-espana-71-andaluces-rechaza-indultar-grinan-por-caso-ere_12037744_102.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-17 10:47:50 UTC
(1689590870615)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-18 02:11:03 UTC
(1689646263914)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-17 06:02:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-17 05:56:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-02-24 21:12:09 -0600 Rating Details