Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-14 23:40:30 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Both statements are factual, but the presentation of California’s ruling with In-N-Out’s policy letter leads readers to believe it applies to California. However, based on the header and wording in their letter, it would NOT apply to California stores. https://www.reuters.com/legal/workers-cant-sue-over-take-home-covid-calif-top-court-rules-2023-07-07/#:~:text=July%207%20(Reuters)%20%2D%20Employers,a%20potential%20flood%20of%20litigation.

Written by BD81C9EB26D48835CAB92A6506D857C61BB3DBE47EEBE8F7845CB4A1186A373C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1679896775107260418

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1679999341220728832
  • noteId - 1679999341220728832
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BD81C9EB26D48835CAB92A6506D857C61BB3DBE47EEBE8F7845CB4A1186A373C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689378030483
  • tweetId - 1679896775107260418
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Both statements are factual, but the presentation of California’s ruling with In-N-Out’s policy letter leads readers to believe it applies to California. However, based on the header and wording in their letter, it would NOT apply to California stores. https://www.reuters.com/legal/workers-cant-sue-over-take-home-covid-calif-top-court-rules-2023-07-07/#:~:text=July%207%20(Reuters)%20%2D%20Employers,a%20potential%20flood%20of%20litigation.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-14 23:40:30 UTC
(1689378030483)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-15 05:11:15 UTC
(1689397875149)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-14 19:18:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 19:08:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 19:06:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 18:58:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 18:52:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 18:52:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 18:43:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 19:18:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 11:15:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 09:10:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 08:38:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 06:56:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 01:30:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 01:13:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 00:02:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 23:23:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 22:19:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 22:10:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 22:04:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 21:57:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 21:57:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 19:49:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 19:45:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 19:32:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-16 16:52:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-16 07:11:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-17 07:19:40 -0500 Rating Details