Birdwatch Note
2023-07-14 19:16:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The claim that the proposed strategy is an effective way to stop people crossing the channel by boat is disputed, particularly since similar strategies have failed elsewhere (e.g. Australia). This has previously been discussed in the House of Commons: https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/1195/pdf/
Written by 869590D4D2826D52CE44E4385C5D6138CA8EC1D1C73F44BCDF232F9EE8D57F93
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1679525452589694980
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1679932955077034021
- noteId - 1679932955077034021
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 869590D4D2826D52CE44E4385C5D6138CA8EC1D1C73F44BCDF232F9EE8D57F93 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1689362202793
- tweetId - 1679525452589694980
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The claim that the proposed strategy is an effective way to stop people crossing the channel by boat is disputed, particularly since similar strategies have failed elsewhere (e.g. Australia). This has previously been discussed in the House of Commons: https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/1195/pdf/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-07-14 19:16:42 UTC (1689362202793) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-15 05:11:15 UTC (1689397875149) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-07-14 15:57:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-14 14:23:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-14 20:21:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-16 05:43:45 -0500 | Rating Details |