Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-13 23:43:54 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. The tweet is correct in that the WHO cancer research agency is labeling aspartame as a possible carcinogen. Discussion of 'safe' dosages is best done in comments. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/whos-cancer-research-agency-say-aspartame-sweetener-possible-carcinogen-sources-2023-06-29/

Written by 2106072920573EAC8033CACA80917F1E31B046A64BF772FF066D7868B270F31D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1679621926631899137

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1679637810863820802
  • noteId - 1679637810863820802
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2106072920573EAC8033CACA80917F1E31B046A64BF772FF066D7868B270F31D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689291834929
  • tweetId - 1679621926631899137
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. The tweet is correct in that the WHO cancer research agency is labeling aspartame as a possible carcinogen. Discussion of 'safe' dosages is best done in comments. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/whos-cancer-research-agency-say-aspartame-sweetener-possible-carcinogen-sources-2023-06-29/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-13 23:43:54 UTC
(1689291834929)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-14 17:11:22 UTC
(1689354682739)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-13 19:31:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 19:12:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 19:11:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 18:58:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 18:58:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 18:45:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:20:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 14:11:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 03:28:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 02:25:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 01:47:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 01:17:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 22:40:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 21:38:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 21:04:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 20:34:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 20:29:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 20:15:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 20:08:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 20:04:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 16:15:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-15 02:23:44 -0500 Rating Details