Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-12 21:15:57 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

knights would mostly wear their armor in battle, & in active combat they would not have the time to properly remove their garments to urinate/defecate, so they may have had to soil themselves to avoid the alternative: getting caught with their pants down (pun intended) https://t.co/6i7C6kozUc §2 p. 3

Written by C3BB68CAD89D1E662A5C5B29B72DA601F017229F7072A4321B918025E1A7BEE9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1678869559057498114

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1679238186336223233
  • noteId - 1679238186336223233
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C3BB68CAD89D1E662A5C5B29B72DA601F017229F7072A4321B918025E1A7BEE9 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689196557017
  • tweetId - 1678869559057498114
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • knights would mostly wear their armor in battle, & in active combat they would not have the time to properly remove their garments to urinate/defecate, so they may have had to soil themselves to avoid the alternative: getting caught with their pants down (pun intended) https://t.co/6i7C6kozUc §2 p. 3

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-12 21:15:57 UTC
(1689196557017)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-13 02:10:42 UTC
(1689214242051)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-12 19:19:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 18:40:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 18:37:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 18:28:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 18:15:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 17:14:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 16:32:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 12:14:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 07:45:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 03:53:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 03:07:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-13 01:08:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 23:08:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 21:14:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 21:01:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-16 17:30:50 -0500 Rating Details