Birdwatch Note
2023-07-12 14:37:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Judge Corley revealed her son's Microsoft role in the 'gamers lawsuit' & FTC v. Microsoft. FTC didn't object. They favoured filing in Northern California due to the 'gamers lawsuit', Microsoft preferred District of Columbia. FTC wanted case in California due to Corley's role. https://twitter.com/tomwarren/status/1679051047006871552
Written by DD9D3106BF50F814B3D92EC6CFA95546B5710177C3E0FE36000A27E09305C258
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1678782000415772673
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1679137974275940356
- noteId - 1679137974275940356
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DD9D3106BF50F814B3D92EC6CFA95546B5710177C3E0FE36000A27E09305C258 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1689172664600
- tweetId - 1678782000415772673
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Judge Corley revealed her son's Microsoft role in the 'gamers lawsuit' & FTC v. Microsoft. FTC didn't object. They favoured filing in Northern California due to the 'gamers lawsuit', Microsoft preferred District of Columbia. FTC wanted case in California due to Corley's role. https://twitter.com/tomwarren/status/1679051047006871552
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-07-12 14:37:44 UTC (1689172664600) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-12 18:23:52 UTC (1689186232181) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-07-12 10:36:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-12 10:33:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-12 13:13:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-12 13:00:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-13 19:26:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-13 18:37:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-13 18:30:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-13 18:24:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-12 22:33:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-17 20:05:47 -0500 | Rating Details |