Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-10 03:01:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The linked article claims that azithromycin and ivermectin were deployed successfully as a treatment to COVID-19. The scientific consensus is that neither have any beneficial effect. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(21)00263-0/fulltext https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2797483

Written by 44AA956C80610B05EDEA00DBE14E3B24112D16C1E42B49DC0D8221A83D915854
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1677465405290430464

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1678238036214050817
  • noteId - 1678238036214050817
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 44AA956C80610B05EDEA00DBE14E3B24112D16C1E42B49DC0D8221A83D915854 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688958102645
  • tweetId - 1677465405290430464
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The linked article claims that azithromycin and ivermectin were deployed successfully as a treatment to COVID-19. The scientific consensus is that neither have any beneficial effect. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(21)00263-0/fulltext https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2797483

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-10 03:01:42 UTC
(1688958102645)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-11 02:09:54 UTC
(1689041394513)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-10 01:46:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 23:58:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 23:04:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 22:45:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 22:23:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-05 22:57:21 -0500 Rating Details