Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-08 16:04:52 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. CN should not mislead. This was one of the 5%. It had passed long full peer review, and was in electronic release pre-print. It is exceptionally rare for a paper to be withdrawn at this point. What was the "rigorous review process" that did this in only 24 hours?

Written by 45EEF9615FE2F3B7D1E98FEA661699D617870D2A9F1EF3ADE39E5A6E9E91C4FB
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1677661200052809728

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1677710348692987905
  • noteId - 1677710348692987905
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 45EEF9615FE2F3B7D1E98FEA661699D617870D2A9F1EF3ADE39E5A6E9E91C4FB Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688832292136
  • tweetId - 1677661200052809728
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. CN should not mislead. This was one of the 5%. It had passed long full peer review, and was in electronic release pre-print. It is exceptionally rare for a paper to be withdrawn at this point. What was the "rigorous review process" that did this in only 24 hours?

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-08 16:04:52 UTC
(1688832292136)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-09 17:10:50 UTC
(1688922650332)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-08 15:50:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 14:07:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 13:40:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 12:03:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 12:00:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 11:09:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 07:03:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 07:01:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-10 23:42:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-17 12:05:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-18 09:48:19 -0500 Rating Details