Birdwatch Note
2023-07-08 15:53:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The AR10 was in production by the Dutch in 1957, in use by the Sudanese army in 1958, and the Portuguese army in 1960. https://www.historicalfirearms.info/post/124606840864/the-portuguese-ai-ar-10-during-the-late-1950s Never mind that the AR15 was designed before the US entered the Southeast Asian conflict as stated in the previous note
Written by 04EBD578EB0867781281B6EF76A200EF229847B5F3C307CF5B1A1F7A26E5D8F7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1677430923459981318
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1677707499783241728
- noteId - 1677707499783241728
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 04EBD578EB0867781281B6EF76A200EF229847B5F3C307CF5B1A1F7A26E5D8F7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688831612903
- tweetId - 1677430923459981318
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The AR10 was in production by the Dutch in 1957, in use by the Sudanese army in 1958, and the Portuguese army in 1960. https://www.historicalfirearms.info/post/124606840864/the-portuguese-ai-ar-10-during-the-late-1950s Never mind that the AR15 was designed before the US entered the Southeast Asian conflict as stated in the previous note
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-07-08 15:53:32 UTC (1688831612903) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-09 17:10:50 UTC (1688922650332) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-07-08 17:54:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 17:37:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 17:20:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 16:55:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 16:51:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 16:50:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 16:45:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 16:07:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 15:59:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 15:48:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 15:38:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 15:37:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 15:23:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 15:22:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 15:06:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 12:03:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 11:52:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 11:07:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 11:00:59 -0500 | Rating Details |